a child at heart
the one and only soki. likes to go around finding my way in life. but i have promises to keep, and miles to go before i sleep


the looking glass
I believe in angels,
The kind that heaven sends,
I am surrounded by angels,
But I call them friends.

- Aizabel Parinas -


dear santa
chocolates and what nots


pops my balloon
boredom


tagboard


blasting into space
04s78
lixiang
ger
zhiyong
pooh
yiteng
kim
huimin
estella
mel
ah goh
sherman
qunxiang
wt&gracie
shimmie
chian hui
jeff
shuyu
julia

LibraryThing
my photo album
ThinkExist


running in reverse
7월 2007
8월 2007
9월 2007
10월 2007
11월 2007
12월 2007
1월 2008
2월 2008
3월 2008
4월 2008
5월 2008
6월 2008
7월 2008
8월 2008
9월 2008
10월 2008
11월 2008
12월 2008
1월 2009
2월 2009
3월 2009
4월 2009
5월 2009
6월 2009
7월 2009
8월 2009
9월 2009
10월 2009
11월 2009
12월 2009
1월 2010
2월 2010
3월 2010
4월 2010
5월 2010
6월 2010
8월 2010
9월 2010
10월 2010
11월 2010
12월 2010
1월 2011
2월 2011
3월 2011
4월 2011
5월 2011
7월 2011
8월 2011
9월 2011

credits
designer DancingSheep
resources + +


neuroscience: dehumanfying?
- 화요일, 12월 15, 2009 -

first, philosophy arises as people seek to find out the why and how of life and of living. then psychology arises to bring about a statistical representation of the what and attempt to explain the why and how with the what. subsequently neuroscience became more popular as it provides real, hard and cold evidence of the what, why, how, and even the when and where.

some people shudder when i enthuse about neuroscience, how people behave the way they do, probably because they have damaged neurons, lesser neurons, smaller hippocampus and what nots. perhaps someone just cant remember your birthday or your favourite food because he/she has a smaller hippocampus. perhaps he/she cant see you wave to catch his/her attention because the visual cortex wasnt activated. he looks but he doesnt see. why does using neuroscience to explain human mind, abstract thinking dehumanify humans?

most research shows that area A in the brain stimulates area B and therefore area C gives a certain end-result. no wonder people think that neuroscience makes everything seems like computer science, brain models become computer models = dehumanifying. but a brain is much more complex than a computer model. theoretically, area A in the brain stimulates area B and therefore area C gives a certain end-result. but realistically, human physiology doesnt have one constant state and you dont only have your eyes stimulated. you have your ears, skin, tongue and nose stimulated all at the same time. and thats just the 5 senses you learn in primary school. as you advance in your studies, you learnt that there are more than 5 senses. there's propioceptors theres nociceptors and all these receptors activate different areas in the brain and then go on to influence each others' outputs to present itself in an unique behavior. neuroscience can explain one aspect, when all other variables remain constant.

many tried to make one living, working cell. have they truly succeeded?
artificial intelligence, can it really take over a human mind?

lab must have gone to my head.

< 21:29 >